Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 5, 2017 at 0:51 history edited Crowley CC BY-SA 3.0
almost complete rewording
May 4, 2017 at 8:30 history edited Crowley CC BY-SA 3.0
edited body
May 3, 2017 at 19:03 comment added Crowley @Erica I cannot notice you from the chat... Thank you for your comment and tried to address them in the rewording. I tried to emphasize what I think is wrong and right on both sides. The previous version lacks the "right" emphasis.
May 3, 2017 at 18:55 history edited Crowley CC BY-SA 3.0
Completely reworded.
May 3, 2017 at 16:50 comment added Acire I think you have a handful of points that are distracting from the main points you want to make. (For example, the OP acknowledges the shortcomings in his approach, so pointing out it is bad provides little responsive information.) Treating an injury seriously (evaluating the wound, focusing on its healing rather than its infliction) can be helpful, however. I think if you edit you can more clearly convey your message; I copied previous comments to a chat room so you can ask for more help there if you'd like additional discussion.
S May 3, 2017 at 16:47 history mod moved comments to chat
S May 3, 2017 at 16:47 comment added Acire Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
May 3, 2017 at 16:30 comment added WRX You said "both approaches are bad". That was enough for me to think the answer wasn't helpful. No one ever takes criticism if it is delivered with any sort of put down -- real or imagined. I think that if you reword your post to be positive -- you will have made a point that might help. example: 1) If you and your wife take different approaches it might be confusing to your boy. I suggest you find a way to compromise and cooperate with each other, and present a more united approach.
May 3, 2017 at 15:44 review Low quality posts
May 3, 2017 at 16:34
May 3, 2017 at 15:41 comment added anongoodnurse Moving this to chat will remove my objection to this answer. The objection is valid. If you think it is not, please flag my comments for (other) moderator attention.
May 3, 2017 at 14:17 comment added anongoodnurse I'll repeat: where have you answered the fundamental question, "How can I be more sympathetic towards my children when they are injured?" (The question is not, "How should I act when my child gets hurt?")
May 3, 2017 at 14:14 comment added Crowley @anongoodnurse What premise I disagree with? The one that OP is cold "I told you" comentator? And my answer lies within "laugh it off", which means do neither show them it is their fault neither it is special case.
May 3, 2017 at 12:28 comment added anongoodnurse One of the policies here is that an answer should not disagree with the premise; another is that it must answer the question. Your answer violates both; you have not answered the fundamental question, "How can I be more sympathetic towards my children when they are injured?"
May 3, 2017 at 11:28 history answered Crowley CC BY-SA 3.0