Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 15, 2015 at 2:54 comment added Guillaume @AmericanUmlaut let's discuss this in a better place: parenting.stackexchange.com/questions/23377/…
Dec 9, 2015 at 5:22 comment added AmericanUmlaut I disagree very strongly with the suggestion that you should present a united front to children. My wife and I make a point of discussing our disagreements together with the children (3 and 5), even when the subject is rules or discipline. I believe this helps them to understand how people can overcome their differences and also lets them understand the reasons for the rules that we set for them. We do emphasize presenting a united front in actually enforcing the decisions that we make, but that doesn't mean we hide the process of arriving at consensus from the children.
Dec 8, 2015 at 8:59 comment added Guillaume We are talking about little children here. Resolving disagreements can be educative for 15 years old, but I would avoid it below 5.
Dec 8, 2015 at 7:52 comment added user13107 If parents "disagree" on some issues, and talk things out, it may give child a lesson in how to disagree with someone. I don't see why that would be a problem.
Dec 8, 2015 at 7:49 comment added Kim Morrison I find the idea that parents must "agree together" strange. Real people don't always agree! Resolving disagreements is far more useful than not having them. I think it also tends to result in an "us against them" mentality between parents and children.
Dec 8, 2015 at 2:27 comment added Guillaume Yes, I edited my answer
Dec 8, 2015 at 2:27 history edited Guillaume CC BY-SA 3.0
added chemicals
Dec 7, 2015 at 11:24 comment added Acire Re your third paragraph: The question here is about pesticides and/or allergen potential of an item, not dirt and bacteria -- does the hygiene hypothesis still apply?
Dec 7, 2015 at 10:51 history answered Guillaume CC BY-SA 3.0