11

I have always frowned on the use of dummies, because my mother (who ran a nursery for 25 years) was adamant that they can hinder a child's speech development.

Our new baby is very unsettled and very collicy, and the midwife is recommending using a dummy to help settle him.

So, is there any evidence behind this claim that it hinders speech development? And if so, what is the age that it starts making a difference?

  • 1
    Our baby was collicy for the first month or so. We would do anything to calm her that seemed harmless. (No Cognac, though.) Giving that virtually every child uses a dummy, I think the small risk that it hinders development is worth taking if it calms her. It'll also help save your nerves. – Dave Clarke May 28 '12 at 15:00
  • 3
    @Mathew Foscarini. Yes "dummy" is the normal word in England. – Urbycoz May 29 '12 at 7:16
  • 1
    @MathewFoscarini: And Australia. – Dave Clarke May 29 '12 at 19:22
  • 2
    Dummy just means 'not the real thing', just like a crash test dummy or a ventriloquist's doll. As for your question, colic will pass, and when it does, you can begin to give your baby the dummy only during nap/sleep times. There's plenty of time until speech begins. – Ana May 30 '12 at 18:19
  • 1
    In the US we also call a pacifier a binky. – Trident D'Gao Nov 8 '12 at 7:34
19

I remembered reading that recent pediatric research in the US has said that pacifiers are OK. I looked at some recent papers and found these:

I would summarize these papers as saying pacifiers are good for infants below 6 months of age, bad for children over 3 years of age, and neutral for children aged 6 months to 3 years.

edit: I realized I didn't actually answer your specific question. I found no papers at all on the subject of pacifiers and speech development, which implies that the concern is not considered credible by current pediatricians.

  • 1
    + 1000: Great list of up to date sources, and intelligent analysis of the relative data. – deworde May 30 '12 at 15:32
  • 1
    Simple... dummies are for sleeping only. That's the rule to follow! – Tim Galvin Dec 20 '16 at 20:51
2

This is my opinion, not a study, but I suspect the statement is related to awake/play time, not rest and sleep. By 6 months your baby should move past the collic phase and so either no longer require the dummy/pacifier or only need it for sleep.

1

LINK to ADA discussion on tooth development

So, it seems that use before teeth start to come in is fine. Like thumb-sucking, stopping it early is the way to go.

Also, if thumb-sucking and pacifier use goes beyond the 'norm', then it might be a problem, but is usually not a significant factor in speech development. LINK speech path

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.