Should this behavior from a child be encouraged or discouraged:

They ask you a question, you answer it, but then they ask

but what if [insert clause here]?

You answer again, but they ask

but what if [insert clause here]?

and so on... in a way that feels like it would never end without you saying "that's it for now" or "but there would always be room for another 'what if'!"?

  • Just curious... why did this get flagged as belongs on parenting.meta.stackexchange.com? Commented Mar 2, 2022 at 1:59
  • 3
    I would guess that someone didn't read the full question, and thought you were asking a question about the parenting.se site, rather than about parenting, as by missing the first line, this could be misinterpreted as you asking whether we as a community should discourage members from asking the same "but what if" questions as your child.
    – B-K
    Commented Mar 2, 2022 at 3:20
  • 2
    @B-K: Could be worse: from the title I thought it belonged on worldbuilding.meta.stackexchange.com
    – Joshua
    Commented Mar 3, 2022 at 0:50

7 Answers 7


In my opinion (as a parent, not a psychologist or educator), curiosity is not something that should ever be discouraged... except that everything has limits rooted in practicality. What the child is doing with the "what if" cycle is to explore the topic and all of the edges. What if... really means "tell me more about this", and it's something that seems to be helping with strategic thinking from what I've seen in my children.

That said, as you say it will go on literally indefinitely. What I usually do is try to continue the line of reasoning for a while, but if it does seem like it's in "indefinite" territory, I try to zoom out a bit. Oftentimes part of why the "what if" cycle happens is the child isn't able to quite frame their thought correctly - so they keep readjusting until they get to what they really want. Zooming out is useful because it gives them more "big picture" context and lets them explore the answer themselves.

The other thing I'll often do is redirect them to answering the "what if" themselves. "Great question. What do you think would happen?" This does two things - it stops the what if train for the moment, and it lets the child develop their own reasoning skills further rather than just asking questions. I might ask the question in a bit more detail than just 'what do you think', depending on the age the child is and the information the question requires; but often it can be as simple as that. Then when the child gives an answer, if it's incorrect or missing information you can add some additional clarifying information as part of the followup.

  • 24
    curiosity is not something that should ever be discouraged - this is beautiful; and not only applicable to young ones.
    – stevec
    Commented Mar 1, 2022 at 13:05
  • 6
    Just came here to give same answer are your redirect! Sometimes I feel like the child is just learning to make conversation and LOVES to be prompted with turning the question back on them.
    – rrauenza
    Commented Mar 1, 2022 at 18:42
  • 1
    +1, I also like "That's a really interesting question to think about" or "Hmm, I wonder" for situations where I don't have the capacity to follow up on a response to "what do you think?" very well. I've sort of cribbed this from Montessori religious ed, where you often say "I wonder..." or "I bet we could go on thinking about this for a long time." Commented Mar 2, 2022 at 16:42
  • 1
    Could you provide an example of what "zooming out" entails?
    – Drake P
    Commented Mar 3, 2022 at 2:41
  • 2
    @Joe that's not an example lol. I comprehend the definition of zooming out but am having a hard time imagining how to use it practically, so a hypothetical scenario could help me envision that
    – Drake P
    Commented Mar 3, 2022 at 16:03

To add to Joe's excellent response, but expand more on the redirect:

Depending on the age of the child (~6 and under), I have found sometimes the endless "why?" or "what if?" is perhaps the child practicing conversation. They don't know how to continue the conversation and get stuck in a loop.

What I do sometimes is flip it around and see how they respond. I ask them "why do you think?" or "what do you think would happen if?" I don't do this in mocking or parroting way, but in a sincere interaction of actually soliciting their opinion.

I have often been pleasantly surprised with a response of smiles and giggles and a monolog of their theory of "why" or "what if." If I get a "I don't know" then I sometimes help them come up with some and talk about them.

  • 4
    Great point - at this age it's easy to forget they learn by practicing simple skills like this, and it's not always obvious what they're actually doing.
    – Joe
    Commented Mar 1, 2022 at 18:50

I have endless patience for sincere attempts to learn.

Endlessly saying "Why?" without listening to the response is a tactic to remain the centre of attention. This is narcissistic and selfish and not something I encourage.

Ask the child to tell you what you just said. If the child can answer, your time is not being wasted. Teach!

  • I would have worded this exact answer had it not been posted already. Excellent advice.
    – dotancohen
    Commented Mar 2, 2022 at 9:31

For any reasonably-imaginative child, there will never be an end to the "what if" scenarios!

Sometimes it's just a game, like "who would win in a fight between Chuck Norris and a Charizard?" (Chuck Norris, clearly, because he has Great Balls.) In this case you can make your answers as ridiculous as you like. Eventually they'll get tired of the joke and move on.

Sometimes it's genuinely about finding out about the world, and assuming that (as an adult) you'll know the answers. If you do know, then great. If you don't, it's never too early to tell a child that you don't have all the answers, in which case you have an opportunity to show what basic research looks like, and hit Wikipedia or Google. That has the double benefit of not just finding the information, but also putting a delay on the next "but what if..." which has a good chance of them losing focus and going onto something else.

There is a negative version though. My niece is currently having some issues with anxiety, and one of the ways that plays out is catastrophizing. "What if (insert worst-case scenario)?", in other words. Parent provides reasons why that can't happen, or solutions against it. "But what if (insert another worst-case scenario preventing that working)?" Rinse and repeat until the scenarios get more implausible. We don't think she is anxious because she actually believes the worst-case scenarios she's thinking up; we think the anxiety is there generally, and these scenarios are her trying to justify that anxiety. At some point her parents have to step in and say "enough", because talking yourself down a rabbit-hole of negative thoughts is not a good thing. Having been clinically depressed myself, I'm personally aware of how negative ideation can affect you, so stopping that spiral is good.

There's a further possibility too, which is that the child has a genuine and well-founded concern, and one they aren't mentally prepared to deal with. Most obviously right now, "what if Putin nukes us?" In this case it may be necessary to flat-out lie to them, because they don't have the mental resilience to handle the truth that there are some "what-ifs" which we just can't do anything about.

  • It's very helpful to bring up catastrophizing by kids; many people aren't familiar with it. We have a question about just that scenario. Commented Mar 4, 2022 at 1:34

There is a place and a time for things. It sounds a bit in your question like you find these questions fine, but get exhausted after a while. If that is the case feel free to delay the what if activity by explaining in what settings you two can play that game. Like saying: "That's and interesting question, but right now I am tired/have to do something else. We will come back to this question at some other time x." Otherwise the other answers are good. I just felt that this part was missing from them.


I would encourage people ask questions (whether a child or adult). Now what's annoying is you feel you don't have time to think and answer those questions. In that case, just simply reply, "I'll think more about it and will answer your questions later." Then you actually make time to think about their questions and get back to them. Most of the time, they don't care (even your kids.) Over the time, they'll notice. That's magic of consistent behaviors.

  • There is also magic in being nice! Part of that means being encouraging to other parents. Being negative in an answer tends to alienate, not motivate. Another answer here makes the same recommendations in a much more relatable manner. Commented Mar 4, 2022 at 1:25

I would discourage over encouraging this sort of behavior as this may lead to a sort of learned helplessness. The best approach is to guide and advice the child on how to find solutions to their own problems, and then help them if they stuck in that process itself.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .