Sometimes (too frequent for my liking) when questioned "Why did you do this 100% prohibited or simply boneheaded thing", my 6- and 8-year-old kids' response is "he/she - pointing at the sibling - told me to do it".

At that, BOTH of them fully and immediately agree that they BOTH knew at the time that they were explicitly prohibited from doing whatever was done.

  1. Is this sort of behavior dangerous? To me, this projects to the future as being more susceptible to peer pressure in negative situations, AND as a major sign that parental opinion and authority is held pretty low ("Didn't we discuss yesterday that when mother tells you one thing and your sister the opposite, you listen to your mother?" "Yes". "So, why did you do it when she asked"? "I donno")

  2. What are good strategies to curb that pattern? I would estimate that they get up to no good at least 2-3 times more often when they are together than when they are alone.

The interesting thing is that it's not ALWAYS younger or older following the other's bad ideas. They both do it.

  • 2
    "If he told you to jump off a cliff, would you do that...?" – Matt May 19 '14 at 11:41
  • @matt oh they know All the right answers . – user3143 May 19 '14 at 11:48
  • How old are they? – Noah May 19 '14 at 16:12
  • @Noah - 6 and 8 – user3143 May 19 '14 at 17:05
  • Aren't six year olds incapable of the kind of logical leap that distinguishes the authority of a parent from the authority of anyone else telling them what to do? In other words, could the six year old really be telling the truth when she says "I dunno?" To put it another way, is either sibling experiencing from the parent figure significant consequences for their behavior that might motivate them to change that behavior and give the parent's words more weight, or do the children simply get more words from the parent? – Robert Harvey May 19 '14 at 18:29

We handle it pretty much the same way we handle any other poor excuse for bad behaviour, such as "because I wanted to". We refuse to accept the excuse and they suffer the agreed on consequences of their misbehaviour.

The first few times my kids tried the "but he told me to" excuse I also explained to them:

  1. That they knew what was right and what was wrong.
  2. I fully expected them to always do what was right even if somebody told them to do something wrong. Even if the person telling them to do the bad thing was me.

I also explained to the child who had been encouraging the other that trying to encourage somebody to do something bad was wrong. If they encouraged their sibling to be naughty then they would suffer the same consequences as their sibling would for the actual misbehaviour.

After a couple of failed attempts at "He told me to" they no longer try it.

If it continues to be a problem with one of them - say the younger continues to misbehave if the older encourages them to do it - then you might want to talk to them about strategies to deal with the situation. Sit down and discuss with them "If your brother/sister tells you to do XYZ and you know its wrong, what do you think you should do?"

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.