Take the 2-minute tour ×
Parenting Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for parents, grandparents, nannies and others with a parenting role. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have always found this fascinating. We are the most intelligent beings on the earth. Still, a rat can give birth to its offspring all by itself, but why is that not happening with humans? Is it just for psychological reasons? Or have humans become weak? If there is a young girl who doesn't know anything about giving birth, what are the chances that the baby and the mom will make it?

share|improve this question
I wonder why this question is down voted. If you guys state a reason, It would help me very much as not to repeat the mistake again. –  dhilipsiva Aug 18 '13 at 19:09
This question makes assumptions that aren't true, which may be part of the reason it is downvoted. Also plenty of animals die giving birth, just as humans do. –  justkt Aug 18 '13 at 22:39
@justkt Forgive my assumptions. Guess I was ignorant. And some part of the questions came out wrong when It was not what I meant. I ll see to that I wont repeat this mistake again. Thanks. –  dhilipsiva Aug 19 '13 at 6:16
@dhilipsiva I've changed the title to focus more on the human aspect, which seems to be what you're mostly interested in (and is also the only part that's really on-topic here). Please feel free to edit further, or even roll back the edit, if you don't believe it improves your question. –  Beofett Aug 19 '13 at 11:54
@Beofett Thanks. Now that is what I really wanted to ask. I didn't know how to ask it properly. –  dhilipsiva Aug 20 '13 at 8:12

4 Answers 4

up vote 14 down vote accepted

One of the core reasons for this is actually a side-effect of the 'most intelligent beings on the planet' - we have very big brains.

Evolution has taken us pretty much to the limit on size at birth - we are already almost the least developed physically at birth. Many mammals can walk an hour after birth, but we have developed large brains, and large heads.

A certain amount of adjustment to a mother's hips has also taken place - widening more would severely impact the ability to walk or run.

What this means is that there is a small, but real risk that the baby will not be born unassisted, and that there is a fair amount of stretching and relaxing required during birth, as well as the potential for stitches and other medical assistance afterwards.

So many people prefer to have this assistance with them, just in case. Especially for their first child.

share|improve this answer
That's the biggest thing; we evolved (or were created as you prefer) to be able to outthink all of God's other creatures, most of which are heavier, faster, and/or better armed than we are. But, that bigger brain means a bigger head, meaning more difficulty getting out of the birth canal, and it also means that human babies are among the most helpless for the longest of the entire animal kingdom, while their primary advantage - their brain - develops. Most other animals are mobile within weeks, if not days or even hours, while a human baby doesn't even roll over on its own for months. –  KeithS Aug 26 '13 at 18:57

Humans are fully capable of having unassisted births, and many chose to have them. Tradition, herd mentality, increased medical knowledge, and (unfortunatly) economical gain have shaped the way child birth is carried out in the world today (with great variety), but the way we birth says nothing about our physical capabilites to do so on our own.

It is entirely impossible to say how any birth will end, complications can arise in a hospital birth, or unassisted or with a midwife at home. In both cases complications may arise from malpractice or unforseen events. A birth that could have ended well at home unassisted could go terribly wrong in the hospital (due to a high level of intervention, for example), and vice versa.

share|improve this answer
No worries. I've edited my answer to reflect your edited question. –  Mia Clarke Aug 19 '13 at 10:05
@MiaClarke - regarding your link, it remains a fact that neonatal deaths at homebirths assisted by non-nurse midwives (i.e. midwives who are not CNMs) or unassisted in the U. S. are 300% higher than hospital births. A study of Oregon homebirths by a homebirth midwife found an 800% higher neonatal death rate. I'm not saying that unassisted births can't go well, just that hospitals and midwives who are also nurses have a much better track record of keeping babies alive. –  justkt Aug 19 '13 at 18:45
I was not making a case for either, I was only talking about what we are physically capable of or not. The link I posted was to highlight the fact that being in a hospital does not automatically mean that you are protected from anything that could possibly go wrong, and that sometimes it can even be preferable to not be in that setting, as there are factors there that may cause things to go horribly wrong that are not present at for example a midwife-led birthing center. –  Mia Clarke Aug 19 '13 at 20:13
"Tradition, herd mentality, and (unfortunatly) economical gain"...umm...sure...but your also missing things like Medical Improvements, helping each other, modern technologies, etc. Your answer seems to imply that there's no statistical reason to give birth in a hospital. –  DA01 Aug 20 '13 at 2:04
@MiaClarke - your answer itself may be intended to be written in a neutral manner, but the article you linked to is as biased as the blog posts on statistics of homebirth deaths under care of a direct-entry midwife, which does reflect on your answer. A source such as Lamaze International, which still has a bias but tries fairly hard to look at the evidence and speculates a lot less than the source you linked, might help improve your answer. –  justkt Aug 20 '13 at 14:49

Your birth question is parallel to a number of other things completely related to civilization. Here's some interesting facts I've heard over the years.

  1. Every other mammal seeks to leave the family that raised them by the time they reach puberty.
  2. No other mammal teaches or is taught by non-family.
  3. Very few mammals have sex for entertainment. (humans, dolphins and I think 1 or 2 whales)

And on and on. There's countless things that separate us from the creatures of the wild. Assisted childbirth is just one of them. Like Neil DeGrasse Tyson says, "the human experience is in that 1% difference in DNA."

share|improve this answer
1) Chimpansees: boys stay, girls go. For elephants its the other way round. (google 'family structure') 2) It's called 'social learning' and it exists. 3) Most do. For bonobo's its also a way to reinforce bonding in the group. –  Ivana Dec 23 '14 at 17:04

There's a big difference between "need assistance" and "want assistance" in childbirth. Think about what our culture communicates about childbirth. Many describe it as 10 times worse than a visit to the dentist.

No surprise that so many want assistance. And since it will only happen a small number of times for most, arranging for assistance is no big deal. Most deliveries are about pain management. That is not to say there aren't real needs in birth. But statistically, they are small numbers.

share|improve this answer
If you're going to cite statistics, please provide references. In the US, about 1 in 3 births are delivered by c-section. Even if half of them are purely elective (less than 1 percent is a far more realistic number for purely elective c-sections), that's not what I would refer to as a statistically small number. –  Beofett Aug 27 '13 at 16:05

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.