Take the 2-minute tour ×
Parenting Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for parents, grandparents, nannies and others with a parenting role. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Our little boy tends to get 3 minutes on the naughty spot when he's done something wrong. After this time one of us tries to explain why he's been naughty spotted and what he should do differently next time. He is then released from the naughty spot and he goes on his merry way ;].

I am concerned that during this explanation he's not listening as he tends to look away while I'm talking. He is usually looking at one of his toys or what his little sister is doing.

My better half is concerned that I am being overly confrontational here. Should I be enforcing this attention/eye contact, or should I wait until he's older?

I am male if that makes a difference to the psychology of the situation.

Any advice gratefully received.

share|improve this question
add comment

7 Answers

up vote 9 down vote accepted

I usually end the timeout with a short as pleasant as possible conversation where I get the child to acknowledge what they did wrong. I find the eye contact less important than the words being spoken.

Example:

Parent: "Do you know why you are in timeout?"
Child:  "I hit my sister."
Parent: "Are you suppose to do that?"
Child:  "No."
Parent: "Are you going to do that again?"
Child:  "No"

If they are a little older, I try to get them to say the words themselves:

Parent: "What are you NOT suppose to do?"
Child:  "I'm not suppose to hit my sister."
share|improve this answer
1  
Sounds like good advice, definitely want to avoid further arguments and get things back on an even keel. I think the eye contact isnt necessary here, but may pull him up when he is paying absolutely no attention ! Thanks for the advice. –  davidfrancis Apr 15 '12 at 22:19
add comment

My oldest sons used to do the same thing. Not because they were avoiding the conversation, but because they were (still are) highly distractable.

Regardless of what their reason for distraction, I don't believe you're being "confrontational". I don't think it's inappropriate to expect your child to pay attention and listen to what you have to say, even for a 3 yr old. As long as you don't expect or try to have a protracted conversation and you keep it short and sweet as suggested (simply because he's very young right now), you're laying the groundwork for the rest of his growth and your roles and teacher and student.

In my case, while talking to my kids, after they'd demonstrated per case that they couldn't maintain focus for the 15 sec convo I wanted to have with them, I'd cup my hands around their head at the temple and make a little tunnel just for our eyes then I'd say my piece. Then we'd go back to building mousetraps or carving quartz figurines or repairing the bandsaw.

share|improve this answer
1  
eye contact and paying attention are not equivalent. –  balanced mama Nov 2 '12 at 0:33
    
For larger people, of course. However, I challenge you to find a 3 yr old or even 7 yr old that they can multitask by facing you talking but thinking of something else. And that's the point of this technique: eliminating distraction and getting the point across . . . /to a 3 yr old./ –  monsto Nov 2 '12 at 15:25
    
I taught in a three's classroom for two years. Already found a number of them. –  balanced mama Nov 3 '12 at 13:45
add comment

Actually talking DURING discipline is usually counterproductive. Both of you are probably upset and for little ones they usually don't really hear you anyway. I usually use a time out with these words. "I am really frustrated about the choices you are making so we are going to have a time out until we are both ready to talk about it" She was then able to come back to me and we could have a discussion. If I was still feeling angry enough that I knew I couldn't listen to her either then I'd tell her I wasn't ready yet, but I'd try to be soon.

Either way, Alice knew that when we did talk she needed to have an honest apology where she told me what she had done wrong (rather than the other way around) and had an idea about what she might do differently next time, or that she was coming to me because she was confused and honestly wanted to talk about how to make it better. Sometimes it takes an hour before she is ready to do this and sometimes 30 seconds. I have never set a timer for her because then instead of thinking about a solution to her behavior she's just thinking about when time will be up and she can leave her chair.

On the eye contact note, if Alice really had made a wrong decision I expected her not look at me (not that I ever told her this). It is an indication of a feeling of shame. Kind of like a dog tucking its tale between its legs. He is actually showing you that you are the boss and he knows it and he is feeling bad (whether he is feeling bad about the action that got him the time out or just feeling bad about the time out is anyone's guess, but he is feeling bad). I'd let the eye contact thing go personally.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Remember that kids are same human beings as the adults are. You should avoid embarassing them. The other thing is being aware you're not always right. When you discipline one kid you could have skipped what the other had done to him before... It's so usual that the aggressor cries louder :)

share|improve this answer
    
Welcome to the site! Your post currently is a comment and not really an answer to the question being asked. We try to emphasize that responses always answer the actual question. Please edit your post (using the edit link below your text) to add more. Read more about answering here. –  Torben Gundtofte-Bruun Jul 31 '12 at 20:17
    
Ok. so my answer is NOT ALWAYS. 'Making' someone to do something just isn't fair –  paramido Jul 31 '12 at 21:13
add comment

Not paying attention when someone is talking to them can be addressed at age 3.

We do it by reminding him of what he is supposed to be doing when someone is talking (i.e. standing straight, hands by sides, looking at person).

This is not specifically a problem to the after timeout talk, so can be worked on at any time.

Definitely it is easier to get this attention when you lower yourself to eye level with the child, so try sitting down and have him standing in front of you and see if it is easier.

But don't expect magic, my 5 year old still acts as if his head is completely empty at times and it can be a bit frustrating.

share|improve this answer
1  
Not looking and not paying attention are not the same thing. Teaching a kid that in our society it is considered more respectful to make eye contact in general while conversing is one thing, but I wish people would stop equating looking and listening as the same thing for the sake of our kids that honestly can't maintain eye contact for long periods of time (especailly while being bawled out) –  balanced mama Nov 2 '12 at 0:31
1  
Your 5 year old's head is not empty. S/he has only spent 5 years on the planet and is constantly absorbing a TON of information. A boss would never force an employee to make eye contact while reprimanding them. Why do we do to children what we would never do to adults? This is not the same as general eye contact when he is not in trouble. –  Christine Gordon Nov 2 '12 at 2:14
    
Please re-read the relevant sentence, you have mis-interpreted it. –  Nat Nov 2 '12 at 2:42
add comment

I've noticed something missing from the procedure:

We to this:

  • [child misbehaves]
  • We don't do X. Please stop.
  • [child misbehaves]
  • We don't do X. Please stop. If you don't you will get a TO
  • [child misbehaves]
  • You have done X. Now you will have TO
  • [TO, during which there is no play/interaction at all]

At the end of TO:

  • Do you know why you are on TO?
  • [ I did X ]
  • Do you have something you want to say?
  • [ Sorry for doing X, dad/mom ]
  • IMPORTANT: Ok, <let off step>. I love you. <hug>

That last step is important to let them know that they're not in trouble anymore and everything is ok again once they do the TO. I find they go back to being their happy selves after that.

share|improve this answer
    
+1 - notice, the parent is hardly speaking in this procedure AT ALL!!! –  balanced mama Nov 2 '12 at 0:33
add comment

You could also a try an approach to time outs where you invite the child to consider cooling down (if they are angry, frustrated, hyper, etc). They come out when they decide they are ready and together you can brainstorm solutions to the problem. (ie was somebody hurt and could use an apology, etc).

This teaches the child to notice when they are upset (a skill many older children have not learned!) and to take space to cool down (they can play music, read, whatever helps them), and then to actually come back to the problem and make a repair.

This is important because the purpose of discipline is to teach, not hurt, a child. Putting a child in timeout doesn't really send home any lessons other than when you are bigger you can boss smaller people around. And, talking during this process just makes you sound like the teacher in classic chlidren's cartoons (wah wah wah). This also means that if the child is not emotional beyond the point of functioning, then a time out isn't actually helpful - the purpose is for them to calm themselves. When they are not overly emotional then go straight to "Whoops, in this family we are helpful not hurtful, how can you repair this mistake?". Let them brainstorm and then pick something they can do.

I would rather help my child become better at self-reflection and self-regulation, understanding that mistakes are okay, and making repairs is necessary and genuine (ie not forced). Hopefully you can see how these skills will directly apply to the playground later (and eventually the workplace and beyond!).

Connected, genuine, respectful relationships with children is my best medicine for building children that are connected, genuine and respectful.

share|improve this answer
    
At a time separate from any incidents, you could brainstorm what this kind of time-out space looks like. Although, the phrase 'time out' is so loaded I don't use it. I use cool down space. Like, "what kinds of things would help you feel relaxed?" "What if you had a place you could go when you were upset to calm down?" I can't tell you enough how powerful these skills are for when he starts school! You want him to learn to make decisions even when you (or other adults) are not there to control him. Isn't that the general goal of parenthood overall? –  Christine Gordon Nov 2 '12 at 2:17
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.