Take the 2-minute tour ×
Parenting Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for parents, grandparents, nannies and others with a parenting role. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Possible Duplicate:
What are the objective arguments against immunizations for infants and children?

I have heard a lot about autism being caused by some immunizations, but haven't found any studies actually proving this. Have there been any? Or have there even been any strong correlations?

Saying something like "nearly all children with autism have had immunizations" means nothing since over 98% of children have been given immunizations. That's pretty much like saying "nearly all autistic children fit within 98% of the scope of all children".

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Marie Hendrix, Sarato, HedgeMage Sep 17 '11 at 3:52

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

No accepted peer reviewed research is available at this time. Some research indicating that there was a link was published but has since been debunked by peers as invalid. This question has been addressed in 2 other related questions on this site and may need to be closed as a duplicate. –  Marie Hendrix Sep 17 '11 at 1:35

1 Answer 1

No. The only well known study showing a link (Wakefield) was subsequently exposed as fraudulent.

This is discussed in more detail at Skeptics SE: http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/607/are-there-any-other-studies-besides-the-discredited-wakefield-studies-that-have

share|improve this answer
This is a good article on this topic: upworthy.com/… –  Marjeta Jul 13 '14 at 20:35

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.