Parenting Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for parents, grandparents, nannies and others with a parenting role. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

What are the effects of teacher job share on pupil attainment, at UK primary school level (age approx 4 to 11)?

In the UK, most pupils have a single teacher for all subjects at this age (rather than subject-specialist teachers) but flexible working practices sometimes permit two teachers to job-share, usually on a basis of 2 days one teacher / 3 days another teacher. Both teachers would still usually be teaching all core subjects.

I am looking for references or studies rather than anecdotal experience.

share|improve this question
I'm curious why they structure things that way. Is that to allow moms to teach part time or something similar? – Joe Jun 19 '14 at 18:32
I'm also intrigued that it works that way in the UK. At least for me, as early as 3rd grade (8-9 yo) I had separate teachers for the major subjects (initially reading and math). – Joe Jun 19 '14 at 18:36
@Joe, some private schools have subject-specific teachers from age 9 or so but in the state school system it's mostly not until you get to secondary school at 11. Re flexible working, it's employment law here that everyone has the right to request flexible working and your employer must "seriously consider" your request, they can only refuse it if there is a valid business reason why it would not be possible. – Vicky Jun 22 '14 at 12:54
I want to add too that it mostly is that way in the US, and it puzzles me. I grew up in Denmark, and at every grade past kindergarten we had different teachers in different subjects. We had the same math teacher from 1st through 9th grade for instance, which build a great relationship. I would worry just one teacher would not have the expertise - even just different perspectives are good for the kids. – Ida Jun 30 '14 at 21:38
up vote 3 down vote accepted

This site seems to have a relevant article but it requires registration to view it:

Edit: here is the paper without registration:

"There is no evidence that splitting responsibility for classes in any way affects pupils’ education. OFSTED concluded in a 1994 research report that the quality of work of part-time teachers, including job sharers, was “significantly above the national average”. In its reports on individual schools OFSTED has commented favourably on the benefits of job share arrangements, including the quality of educational provision and the good progress made by pupils taught by job sharers. In addition, employment tribunals have rejected any assumption that job sharing has an adverse effect on education."

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.